** Ping-pong on cube complexes **

Joint work with Michah Sageev.

Sageev and Wise’s version for cubed groups states that a subgroup of such a group is either finitely generated virtually abelian, or contains a free group (this requires an extra assumption: there is a bound on the size of finite subgroups). We study variants of this.

**1. Property Pnaive **

A group has property Pnaive if for every finite subset not containng 1, there exists a element of infinite order such .

This was introduced by Bekka-Cowling-de la Harpe in connection with -simplicity. is -simple if has no nontrivial ideals. They prove that Pnaive implies is -simple.

Unknown wether , have Pnaive.

** 1.1. A book-keeping theorem **

Theorem 1For a group acting properly and cocompactly on a finite dimensional cube complex , the following are equivalent:

- has Pnaive.
- is -simple.
- is ICC.
- The amenable radical of is trivial.
- the -action is faithful and is not Euclidean.

Due to many people. Our contribution is (5)(1).

If one relaxes the cocompactness assumption, and replaces it with a bound on the size of finite subgroups, (2)(4) remains true (Breuillard-K-K-Ozawa).

** 1.2. Main theorem **

Say a subgroup is inessential if there is an orbit which is entirely contanined in some halfspace. Say a family of subgroups is simultaneously inessential if this happens for the whole family with the same halfspace.

Theorem 2 (Kar-Sageev)Let act properly and cocompactly on a finite dimensional cube complex , which is irreducible, not Euclidean. Let be simultaneously inessential subgroups. Then there exists such that .

**2. Uniform exponential growth **

It does not follow from earlier statements, by lack of uniformity.

See Sageev’s talk at NPC in action january 2017 workshop. For groups acting freely on square complexes, we show that there are short elements generating a free subgroup.

**3. Proofs **

We use the Roller boundary, obtained from ultrafilters on the collection of all half-spaces.

Say two hyperplanes are strongly separated if no hyperplane intersecting one of them may intersect the other. Caprace and Sageev show that there exist chains of halfspaces in which consecutive hyperplanes are strongly separated. The corresponding ultrafilters are called strongly separated. We work with the closure of strongly separated ultrafilters in the Roller boundary.

Here are the main properties used: the action of on is topologically free. Three distinct points of have a well-defined median which is a vertex of . The fixed-point set of an isometry on has empty interior.

**4. Questions **

Lubotzky: what about mapping class groups? Johanna Manganas shows uniform exponential growth. Bridson-de la Harpe prove -simplicity. Abbot-Dahmani prove Pnaive for acylindrically hyperbolic groups.