Today, we show that isoperimetric inequalities pass to asymptotic cones (this requires the theory of currents in metric spaces). I intend to prove the proposition about Lipschitz disks with positive area, and use it to prove non exactly polynomial Dehn function for certain nilpotent groups.
1. Currents in metric spaces
Started by Ambrosio and Kirchheim in 2000. Urs Lang, and indepedently Thierry de Pauw and Bob Hardt recently gave alternate versions.
The idea, going back to De Giorgi, is to replace differential forms with tuples of Lipschitz functions,
1.1. Definition
Definition 1 Let
be a complete metric space. Let
A function
is a metric
-current if
- Multilinearity:
is multilinear.
- Continuity: If
converge pointwise to
with uniformly bounded Lipschitz constants, then
converges to
.
- Locality: If some
is constant on the support of
, then
.
- Finite mass: There exists a Borel measure
, concentrated on a
-compact set, such that, on
,
We denote by
the space of metric
-currents.
Remark 1
- Locality forces
to depend on
rather than on
itself.
- Continuity axiom is stronger than in Euclidean geometric measure theory. For instance, the evaluation of a differential form at a
-covector at some point is a current in the sense of Federer and Fleming, but it does not satisfy our continuity axiom (test on
- Finite mass implies that
continuously extends to bounded functions
.
Proposition 2 Let
. Denote by
the collection of measures
as in axiom (4). Define, for a Borel set
,
This is a finite Borel measure, and
Moreover
Remark 2 In Federer and Fleming’s theory,
Definition 3 The measure
, as well as its total mass
, are called the mass of current
.
Corollary 4 Mass is lower semi-continuous with respect to weak convergence, i.e. if
for all
, then
1.2. Constructions
\subsubsection{Boundary operator}
For , m
, define
Then satisfies axioms (1) to (3). Say that
is a normal current if
has finite mass, i.e. is again a current. Notation
Remark 3 This fits with the classical definition. Furthermore, by locality,
.
\subsubsection{Push forward}
If is Lipschitz,
, define
Then and, as positive measures,
\subsubsection{Multiplication with Borel functions}
Let be a bounded Borel function on
. Define
Then . In particular, if
is a Borel set, the restriction of
to
is
.
\subsubsection{Standard example}
Let . Define
Then .
Remark 4
- Only continuity is non trivial.
- For
and
smooth,
.
- If
has bounded variation, then
is a normal current, and
in the notation of
theory.
1.3. Compactness theorem
Theorem 5 Let
be a compact metric space,
a sequence of normal currents with
Then there is a subsequence which weakly converges to a normal current.
1.4. Integral currents
Definition 6 A
-dimensional current
is called integral rectifiable if there exist points
and non zero integers
such that on Lipschitz functions
,
If
, a current
is called integral rectifiable if
is concentrated on a countably rectifiable set, i.e. a countable disjoint union of biLipschitz images of subsets in
, and
vanishes on sets of vanishing
-dimensional Hausdorff measure.
- For every open
and Lipschitz
, there exists an integer valued function
such that
We denote by
the space of integral rectifiable
-currents.
Theorem 7 (Representation theorem). Let
be an integral rectifiable
-current. Then there exist subsets
, biLipschitz maps
and integer valued
functions
on
such that
and
Definition 8 An integral current is a normal current which is integral rectifiable. The space of integral
-currents is denoted by
.
Note that . A
-cycle is an integral
-current
with
.
1.5. Slicing
Let be a normal current and
a Lipschitz function. The slices of
with respect to
are the currents
In some sense, this is the restriction of to the level set
.
Theorem 9 (Slicing Theorem). For almost every
,
is a normal
-current, with its mass concentrated on
.
.
- If
is an integral current, so is almost every
.
Proof: Think of coarea formula
1.6. Closure Theorem
Theorem 10 If
is a weakly converging sequence of integral currents with uniformly bounded
, then the limiting normal current is again an integral current.
This allows to solve Plateau’s problem in the class of integral currents.
2. Isoperimetric inequalities and asymptotic cones
Up to now, we insisted on filling cruves with disks. We need compactness, and for this we shall replace disks with currents. Since currents do not have prescribed topology, one may view the filling function for currents as a homological version of the disk filling function.
2.1. Homological filling function
Definition 11 For
, define
A Lipschitz curve
defines an integral current
, again denote by
, whose mass is the length of
, and we define
A priori, , with
for Riemannian manifolds, but only
in general, since the mass of integral
-currents is not exactly equal to area.
Theorem 12 (Wenger 2010) Let
be a geodesic metric space, let
be a geodesic thickening pf
. If
then there exists
such that for every asymptotic cone
of
, and for all
,
Remark 5 Since every integral
-current
with
is a countable sum of curves, quadratic filling for curves implies a quadrating filling inequality for all integral cycles.
Corollary 13 Let
be a finitely presented group with quadratic Dehn function. Then every asymptotic cone
has quadratic filling for
-cycles.
Panos Papasoglu shows that quadratic Dehn function implies that is simply connected. Does quadratic Dehn function imply that
is quadratic ?
3. Completion of proofs
3.1. Proof of the proposition about cones of non hyperbolic spaces
Proposition 14 (Wenger 2008) Let
be a geodesic metric space,
a geodesic thickening with quadratic filling. If
is not hyperbolic, there exists an asymptotic cone
of
, a compact set
and a Lipschitz map
such that
has positive
-dimensional Hausdorff measure.
Proof: of Proposition from Theorem 12.
Let be an asymptotic cone which is not a tree. Then there is a closed Lipschitz curve
in
such that the corresponding current is not identically zero. Take for
a constant speed parametrization of a geodesic triangle
such that
is not included in
. Let
denote distance to
and
the maximum of
and
. For
small enough,
Theorem 12 gives an integral current filling
. Then
. According to the Representation Theorem 7,
,
, so there is
such that
.
3.2. Preparation for the proof of Theorem \ref
}
In order to apply the Compactness Theorem 5, we must arrange a sequence of fillings in to sit in a fixed compact metric space. For this, thanks to Gromov’s compactness criterion for metric spaces (in the Gromov-Hausdorff distance), it suffices to control the size of nets on fillings. For this, one constructs fillings which leave a definite fraction of their mass in balls.
Proposition 15 (Ambrosio, Kirchheim) Let
be a metric space. Assume that
has a quadratic filling inequality for
. Let
be a cycle and
. There is
with
such that
.
- For each
and all
,
Proof: Assume first there exists a mass minimizing with
. Let
and
, the distance function to
. For almost every
,
By minimality,
Integrate this differential inequality to get .
In general, consider the set of integral
-currents filling
with mass
. For every
, there exists in
an
such that for all
,
This is a very general fact which follows from completeness (and not compactness) of (known as Bishop-Phelps, or Ekeland variational principle).
For every competitor ,
Thus, using quadratic filling inequality,
and the proof ends as before.
3.3. Sketch of the proof of Theorem \ref
}
We assume that has quadratic filling, and show that asymptotic cones do as well. Step 1. Show that there exists a geodesic thickening
of
which has
for all
. For this, cover
with balls which sufficiently overlap, then replace them by their injective hulls.
Step 2. Let be a Lipschitz loop in an asymptotic cone
. Pick a partition
of
. Show that there exists a Lipschitz loop
, with
, with shorter lengths between successive
‘s, and an integral
-current
filling
, with
. This suffices, since holes between
and
can be inductively filled, achieving a convergent series of currents whose sum fills
.
To construct , let
, view
as a sequence
. Complete
into a geodesic polygon
. Use Proposition 15. Since
are uniformly Lipschitz, they can be filled with integral
-currents
in such a way that
-
.
-
.
-
for all
,
.
The sequence of metric spaces is uniformly compact, since we have upper bounds for the size of
-nets on it for all
. Gromov’s compactness theorem implies that all these spaces simultaneously embed isometrically into a fixed compact metric space. Apply the compactness theorem 5 in that space to extract a subsequence such that
-
converge in Gromov-Hausdorff sense to a compact metric space
.
- The curves
converge to a curve
in
.
- The currents
converge to an integral
-current
in
.
- The (inverse) isometric embeddings
converge to an isometric embedding
.
Then in
,
in
and
4. Carnot groups with non exactly polynomial Dehn function
4.1. Superquadratic Dehn function
Theorem 16 (Wenger 2010) Let
be a
-step nilpotent Lie group with Lie algebra graded as
. Assume that there exists
which is not a bracket
for any vectors
,
. Consider the Lie group
with Lie algebra
. Endow
with a left-invariant Riemannian metric. Then
Remark 6 If
, then there exists
satisfying the assumption in Theorem 16.
4.2. Application to central products
Let be a
-step nilpotent Lie group with Lie algebra graded as
. Given
, let
denote the Carnot group with Lie algebra
with Lie bracket . This will be called the
-fold central product of
.
Example 1 If
is the first Heisenberg group,
is the
-th Heisenberg group.
Corollary 17 Let
be a
-step Carnot group with Lie algebra
. Suppose
and there exists
which cannot be written
Let
be the Lie group with Lie algebra
and
the
-fold central product of
. Then
Proof: The central product can be viewed as
where
. So Theorem 16 applies provided
is not a bracket in
, i.e.
is not a sum of
brackets in
.
Example 2 Start with the free
-step nilpotent Lie algebra with
. Set
. Then
is not a sum of
bracket of two vectors if
.
Indeed, as an alternating bilinear form, its rank is , whereas a sum of
brackets has rank at most
.
Theorem 18 (Olshanskii, Sapir, Young) Let
be a
-step Carnot group containing a lattice. Then its
-fold central product,
, has
If furthermore
is free
-step nilpotent, then
Corollary 19 There exists a
-step Carnot group
such that
but
is not
.
4.3. Preparation for the proof of Theorem \ref
}
A Carnot group has Lie algebra graded as . The map
defined by
is an automorphism. It integrates into a group automorphism.
The Carnot-Carathéodory metric is the left-invariant geodesic metric obtained by minimizing length of curves tangent to the distribution of left-translates of
. It is homogeneous of degree
under
.
It follows that every asymptotic cone of is biLipschitz to
. In fact (Pansu 1983), the asymptotic cone is unique.
4.4. Proof of the lower bound on Dehn function
Let be a
-step Carnot group, let be
the group with Lie algebra
. We show that the second homology of the asymptotic cone
does not vanish.
Claim: There are Lipschitz loops which do not bound any integral current in
.
To construct , merely pick a Lipschitz horizontal curve in
joining the origin to
, and project it to
. Assume that there exists an integral
-current
in
such that
. By the representation theorem 7,
where is Lipschitz,
,
.
Note that projection along defines a Lipschitz map
.
is an integral current in Euclidean
filling
. Let
be a linear functional on
which does not vanish on
. Then
defines a
-form on
as follows:
Then
where is the canonical basis of
.
Let us show that for all
and almost everywhere on
. At almost every point of
, all Lipschitz maps
are differentiable. The differential
is a group homomorphism
. The image of the corresponding Lie algebra homomorphism is an abelian subspace in
. Its image by
is an subspace of
on which the
-bracket vanishes, i.e. the
-bracket is colinear to
. Since we assumed that
is not a bracket of
vectors from
, the
-bracket vanishes on the image of
. So
.
The contradiction proves the claim.